SenateTuesday 3 March 2026
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Senator DUNIAM (Tasmania—Manager of Opposition Business in the Senate) (14:02): Does the minister concede that the sole person among the group of 34 who's been issued a temporary exclusion order should not have been given a passport to Australia first? Doesn't that defy the most basic purpose of the temporary exclusion legislation of 2019, which was to prevent a person from obtaining an Australian passport in circumstances exactly like these?
SourceSenate, Tuesday 3 March 2026 — official recordTA-260303-senate-e54fd52a2984:s161
Ask AskTribune