AskTribune · ArchiveOpen AskTribune →

← Notes archive

House of RepresentativesWednesday 3 June 2026

QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE

Dr CHALMERS (Rankin—Treasurer) (14:15): I just said to the Deputy Prime Minister that I hope the shadow Treasurer asks me about productivity, and he has. There are three reasons I'm pleased he's asking me about productivity. The first reason is that the budget we handed down from this dispatch box a few weeks ago was more focused on the productivity challenge than were any of the budgets handed down by those opposite in the wasted decade of missed opportunities that preceded us.

That's the first point. The second point is that I'm told that the shadow Treasurer put out a press release today talking about productivity, and this is what he said about productivity. He said productivity is down by five percent since this government took office.

So I checked out that number, and I'm pleased that I did. I want to tell the House why I'm pleased I checked out that number. It turns out that the five per cent number that the shadow Treasurer is using includes the March quarter of 2022.

Now, we were elected in May of 2022, the first time. So I thought to myself, 'I wonder why he's including the March quarter of 2022 and pretending Labor was in office when the coalition was in office.' Let me tell you why he's doing that. It's because productivity in the March quarter of 2022 fell by 2.3 per cent, and that was the biggest fall in productivity in more than 40 years.

So it always pays to check the numbers. The shadow Treasurer got the fuel excise wrong, he got his fuel security policy wrong, he got the number of shareholders amongst young people wrong and he got the dual mandate for the Reserve Bank wrong—again and again and again. The SPEAKER: The manager on a point of order?

Mr Tehan: On relevance: the question was, why are you putting in place a productivity tax during a productivity crisis? The SPEAKER: Yes, that was the question, but the other issues I think the Treasurer is addressing are regarding the capital gains tax changes—the way they were described as a 'missile that identifies the most dynamic, highest growth, job-creating' and a whole lot of other things.

He wasn't asked about the opposition, so I'm just going to make sure that the Treasurer is being directly relevant. He won't be able to talk about the opposition's policy, because he wasn't asked about the opposition's policy; he was asked about his policies. The Treasurer has the call.

Dr CHALMERS: Thank you, Mr Speaker. I was asked about productivity and the performance of productivity in our economy, and I've explained why the number the shadow Treasurer used today is especially dishonest. When it comes to the tax reforms in the budget, it takes a special kind of thinker to see a productivity challenge that has existed in our economy for decades and think the answer to that is to leave everything exactly as it is.

When Howard and Costello made the big mistake at the turn of the century, they said that share investment would go up, and it went down. It turbocharged the challenges we have in our housing market. It locked generation after generation of young people out of housing.

We're taking the difficult decisions to change that, and we've got a budget which is very focused on productivity as well.

SourceHouse of Representatives, Wednesday 3 June 2026 — official recordTA-260603-house-804d9cb5f6e1:s216