AskTribune · ArchiveOpen AskTribune →

← Notes archive

SenateTuesday 8 September 2026

ADJOURNMENT

Senator ANTIC (South Australia) (19:43): There's a quiet revolution that's transforming free citizens into something far less free. We're being controlled, and we're being turned into vassals not by armies or kings in the old sense but by a modern form of digital feudalism that strips ordinary Australians of ownership and makes them permanent renters in their own lives.

It's happening in every aspect of our lives, and now it even extends to the physical ownership of chattels. Consider what's happening. It's already happened in a single generation.

Let's take music for example. Compact discs and DVDs sat on our shelves, available whenever we chose, but they're being replaced by streaming services that can remove content, raise prices and lock us out at will. Software we once bought and owned forever has now turned into a perpetual subscription.

Memory cards and hard drives once owned forever are now being replaced by cloud storage that we must rent every month. It's not progress; it's the systematic transfer of ownership from the individual to distant corporations and increasingly to an administrative state that partners with them. In the feudal system, vassals didn't own the land.

It was held at the pleasure of the lord, subject to conditions, fees and the constant risk of forfeiture. Today, the digital lord collects the rent in monthly instalments and retains the power to revoke access with a single keystroke, and that pattern is spreading. Motor vehicles now are increasingly software locked platforms, property we don't truly control.

Books, tools and even data of our own lives have been converted into services that we never actually finally progress. We're told it's modern and efficient, but, in truth, it's a profound shift in the relationship between individuals and the things that sustain independent life. Ownership has always been central to a free society.

The man who owns his tools, his home and the products of his labour answers first to himself and to his family. The man who merely rents them answers to the landlord. When the landlord is a handful of global tech companies, often working hand in glove with governments keen on digital identity systems and programmable money, the risk is no longer theoretical; it's structural.

Australians have already seen the early stages of this control architecture—the push for digital ID, expansion of surveillance powers and the quiet preparation for programmable central-bank digital currencies. If you pair those tools with a population that no longer owns its own goods, you create the perfect conditions for modern serfdom. Compliance becomes the price of continued access and dissent can be met with deplatforming, account suspension or simple withdrawal with a digital key.

Not that long ago, property rights and the dignity of ownership weren't just optional extras; they were the foundation of personal independence and national sovereignty. We're now being invited to trade that inheritance for the temporary convenience of never having to manage our own affairs. Well, I reject that bargain.

Australians should be able to buy things once and own them. They should be able to store their own data without paying rent to a foreign server farm, they should be able to drive a car without seeking permission from a software update and they should be able to participate in the digital world without surrendering the fundamental right to own, rather than merely access.

We are sleepwalking into a society of permanent renters dependent on the goodwill of corporate and bureaucratic overlords. I know which side I'm on. The question is whether this parliament and this government have the will to protect us from it.

SourceSenate, Tuesday 8 September 2026 — official recordTA-260908-senate-59cec871b8cf:s094