Portfolio — 22 May 2026
Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino used a PM media release on 22 May to put Treasury's quantitative case for the budget's housing tax package, anchoring the government's position in economic modelling rather than assertion. The headline figure: roughly 75,000 homes are projected to move from investor ownership to owner-occupancy as a direct result of the measures [TA-260522-treasu-45e7fd91cf19].
Treasury's modelling also forecasts a modest moderation of house-price growth — approximately 2 percent — sustained for a couple of years after the package takes effect. Mulino framed these projections alongside the budget's $2 billion supply commitment, which the government says will unlock an additional 65,000 homes and continues a four-year program to lift housing supply [TA-260522-treasu-45e7fd91cf19].
The pairing of demand-side tax reform with supply-side investment is the consistent dual-track message the government has carried through the budget cycle.
The release also addressed the trust taxation changes directly, which suggests the government is responding to questions about scope and unintended consequences. Mulino confirmed the package leaves bequests, disability trusts, and orphan arrangements unchanged, while aligning the tax treatment of discretionary testamentary trusts with labour-earned income [TA-260522-treasu-45e7fd91cf19].
That clarification is aimed at narrowing the political attack surface — distinguishing targeted reform from broader wealth-transfer disruption.
The reliance on Treasury modelling as the communications centrepiece is the defining strategic choice in today's release. Mulino positioned modelled outcomes — rather than stated policy intent — as the primary evidence for the package's housing affordability impact [TA-260522-treasu-45e7fd91cf19]. This approach shifts the ground of debate toward technical methodology, though it also exposes the government to scrutiny of the modelling's assumptions.
No parliamentary contributions from Mulino were recorded for this date; the comms record stands alone.
The official records this note draws on — the raw primary documents themselves, as published.