Australian News Media Bargaining Code and Levy

Here is what the public record holds — the most substantive material is the April 2026 exposure draft and the ministerial press conference, which together give a detailed picture.

---

The News Bargaining Incentive: what the record shows

The existing News Media Bargaining Code has a structural flaw the government has publicly acknowledged: digital platforms can sidestep their obligations simply by removing news from their services. The government's response — the News Bargaining Incentive (NBI) — was released as exposure-draft legislation on 28 April 2026 [TA-260428-infras-ab01efd8c011] [TA-260428-pm-50d0307b7e58].

The levy mechanism

The NBI imposes a charge of 2.25 per cent of Australian-generated revenue on covered platforms — currently Meta, Google and TikTok [TA-260428-pm-50d0307b7e58]. Platforms can reduce that liability by entering commercial deals with eligible news publishers:

• Deals with traditional/larger media attract a 150 per cent offset, reducing the effective rate to approximately 1.5 per cent of Australian revenue
• Deals with smaller media organisations attract a 170 per cent offset — a deliberate tilt toward diversity and regional/community publishers [TA-260429-treasu-3eb987360819]

The government's stated target is that platforms will do deals, not pay the levy. The 1.5 per cent effective rate is calibrated to approximate the commercial deal quantum under the original Code [TA-260429-treasu-3eb987360819].

Platform eligibility thresholds

The scheme applies to platforms meeting a two-limb test: at least $250 million in Australian-generated revenue, plus either 5 million users (social media) or 10 million users (search). As the Assistant Treasurer, Mr Mulino, explained, this is designed to capture organisations with genuine market power; additional platforms would be captured as they cross those thresholds [TA-260428-pm-50d0307b7e58] [TA-260429-treasu-3eb987360819].

Revenue distribution

Critically, collected charges are not retained as government revenue. The release states every dollar is redistributed to the news media sector, with the distribution mechanism weighted by journalist employment — the more journalists an organisation employs, the more it receives. A separate consultation paper on the distribution mechanism was released simultaneously [TA-260428-infras-ab01efd8c011].

What is excluded

AI platforms are expressly excluded from the NBI's scope. The Assistant Treasurer confirmed AI is being addressed through a parallel copyright process led by the Attorney-General [TA-260429-treasu-3eb987360819].

Enforcement gap — what the record does not hold

The records we have cover the exposure-draft and ministerial communications stage (April–May 2026). The bill was flagged for introduction in the winter sittings (by end of June 2026) [TA-260429-treasu-3eb987360819], but the records in view do not confirm whether it was introduced or passed — the Commonwealth 2026-06-04 Note and the 2 July sitting Notes do not record the NBI bill reaching a reading stage. The enforcement mechanism (penalties for non-payment, the administering regulator, and compliance powers) is not detailed in the fetched records; those provisions would be in the draft legislation itself, which is not in the corpus.

The most active speakers on media regulation in the record are the Minister for Communications, Ms Wells (18 contributions), Senator Payman (15), and the Prime Minister (12) [speakers_for_issue graph output]. Senator Hanson-Young is the most active crossbench voice (7 contributions), primarily on online safety bills rather than the NBI specifically.

---

Perspectives to explore:

• The Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee was asked to examine the Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2026 [TA-260701-senate-9e9f426c67a1:s094] — the same committee that would likely scrutinise the NBI bill. Opening the Senate 2 July Note would surface whether the NBI was mentioned in that sitting's business.
• The Greens' position on the NBI is not yet in the fetched records; Senator Hanson-Young's contributions on media regulation may carry it.

Did the NBI bill reach a parliamentary reading before the winter recess, or is it still pending for the August sittings? What position did the Opposition take on the News Bargaining Incentive during consultation? How does the NBI's distribution mechanism treat public broadcasters like the ABC compared with commercial publishers?

(We've reached the fetch limit for this session — I'd recommend saving this thread or creating a 'My Note' to carry the research forward efficiently.)